What Made Pallavi Purkayastha’s Murder Possible
Pallavi Purkayastha was, by all accounts, an exemplary 25-year-old. She was a lawyer, a national-level swimmer, popular among friends who extolled her feisty spirit and in a committed relationship with Avik Sengupta, her college sweetheart. They lived together in Himalayan Heights, a building in Wadala’s Bhakti Park, and planned to marry. Purkayastha’s parents were both senior IAS officers, so she had pedigree. Her murder at the hands of Sajjad Mughal, the building watchman who entered her flat in the early hours of August 9 with rape on his mind, was keenly felt by the city because it was a case of a promising life brutally cut short. The news particularly affected Mumbai’s women for whom dealing with lecherous building watchmen is commonplace.
The police have reacted by declaring that they will visit housing societies to verify the credentials of security guards and domestic help. The agency that employed Mughal has been blamed for being careless—in its records, the guard’s address in his native state of Kashmir was incomplete. Of course background checks are important (Mughal would have been hard to trace with the address he had provided had he not been caught at Mumbai Central station trying to flee the city). But perhaps the problem is more cultural than procedural. It has been pointed out that security guards, who are usually migrants from villages and small towns, experience something of a culture shock in Mumbai. They’re unprepared for women who lead independent lives, that is, work late, have male friends, wear clothes that the more conservative might consider revealing and so on. It’s possible that their lewd behaviour stems from a perception that such unorthodoxy must mean loose morals. (Sadly, this is a misconception that’s commonly held by even highly educated people who’ve lived in cities all their lives).
One often hears of watchmen behaving inappropriately. Neha Sharma, who now works in her family business in Delhi, used to live in Bandra and work long hours in an advertising agency. “I remember a time when I got back pretty late from work and as I was walking into my building, a slightly drunken watchman asked me something really creepy like, ‘Aap service dete hain?’ I was so totally freaked out and scared that I shouted at him and ran into the house.” Women who live alone are particularly vulnerable. Suhani Kanwar, a Mumbai-based scriptwriter, said that she was harassed by a watchman when she was single and living in a rented apartment. “I think the latter makes a difference too,” she said. “The building society is usually out to make life harder for women who rent, so the watchman knows it’s unlikely that he will be reported.” (This is not to imply that all watchmen are from hell. Some of the women I interviewed described their security guards as avuncular and even angelic).
Cops are now enforcing existing rules that require guards to provide all sorts of documentation such as character certificates from the police stations in their hometowns. But as papers verifying identity are notoriously hard to procure in India, forged documents are a major risk. Perhaps security agencies should equally be encouraged to counsel their guards. The larger security agencies do train their employees in what HR professionals like to call “soft skills”. Niraj Bijlani, direct of guarding for TOPSGRUP, said in an email interview, “We conduct psychometric tests of our guards during their training and a team of psychologists observes them to find [tendencies] like uncontrolled anger, shoplifting or even problems dealing with confrontation. If we find any such individuals we counsel them, give them special attention to curb such nature and put them under observation till the time we are sure that they are safe to be deployed.”
Badly trained guards, Bijlani said, are usually from “fly-by-night operators which do not follow the regulations, they target clients such as housing societies or small businesses which are price sensitive and provide poor quality of service at a very low price”. Whether psychometric tests, which are far from fail-safe, can predict a candidate’s predilection for crime is moot. It’s clear that what needs to be tackled is a sexist bias.
Perhaps, for a start, residents of building societies could pay more attention to the guards they hire. Perhaps they could themselves counsel watchmen who misbehave instead of ignoring them. Mughal’s colleagues told the police that he teased women in the building and he confessed to wanting to rape Purkayashtha because she rebuked him for staring at her. What if Mughal had been cautioned by the residents of Himalayan Heights? There’s no way of knowing if this would have made a difference to Mughal. But unless steps are taken to change mindsets, the Purkayasthas of the city will continue to be vulnerable.
Tags: Pallavi Purkayastha, security guards, The ViewfinderComments (10)
Leave a comment
Featured Articles
Nido Slated To Open In June
May 22, 2013 by Editors
The Vigil Idiot: Aurangzeb
May 20, 2013 by Sahil Rizwan
MB Recommends: ‘Dharavi The City Within’
May 20, 2013 by Nayantara Kilachand
Lessons To Be Learned From The Bandra-Worli Sea Link
May 20, 2013 by Pronoti DattaYou Might Also Like...
There’s another important thing I remember about this incident. The woman told her husband/boyfriend that the watchman made her feel uncomfortable. But he just brushed aside her comments saying that he stares at her because she’s so beautiful. He later regretted that he didn’t listen to her (he said so in an interview with HT). Often women’s concerns are confused with paranoia and not taken seriously. Given incidents like these, I think one can never be too cautious no? And maybe all of us need to take it upon ourselves to stand up for women around us who are harassed daily.
Some of the commentators (all 3 men surprise surprise) have really lost the plot. It has NOTHING to do with them being paid less/tired/away from homes. A human being wants to rape another human being because they berated them for being lecherous? How is this justifiable under any social bracket? Women should just shut up and think “Oh he’s had a hard day, let’s cut him a little slack” and let it go? It’s bad that there are people doing such heinous acts but it’s even WORSE that there are people who BELIEVE it’s ok. What if it happens to your mother/sister/daughter?
very thoughtful piece. have always felt this strange sense of two worlds with one’s domestic helpers — drivers, watchmen, etc — esp after reading ‘white tiger’
And how can you justify economic reasons for assault on a woman?? If the housing society is not paying its guards well, is that a good enough reason to actually molest a young girl or to undress her with your eyes?
Help me here Ritwam…so since ” Trust & respect is a two way street, it cannot be demanded but has to be nurtured”, are we implying that if another working woman in Mumbai gets murdered, it might have something to do with the lack of the abovementioned virtues and nothing to do with the patriarchal society we live in, which actively perpetuates crimes against women? If I, after putting in 12-hr work days return home, I am expected to discuss my watchman’s abandonment issues since that could pre-empt any rape attempt on me in the future? Treating fellow human beings well is completely different from the issues this article is pointing out.
You pay a guy Rs 1800 a month & expect him to be courteous , attentive & alert. If you ( including the housing societies & the securities agency ) pay peanuts, you will get monkeys to guard us. The housing societies don’t bother to splurge lakhs on festivities like Dandia, Ganeshutsav, New Year celebration etc but when it comes to paying for security guards, they will cut corner to employ the cheapest labour available. How many times have you seen the house owners treat/talk properly with these guards, who are looked down with contempt & at best treated as manual labourers. Trust & respect is a two way street, it cannot be demanded but has to be nurtured. When was the last time you even spoke to your watchmen about any issues facing him ( even though he spends better part of the day in your vicinity guarding you )
I’ve had a lot of trouble with the watchman in my building. He would stare inappropriately, make blank calls to the house and once even refused to unlock the gate because it was late. I had him reported. This story was incisive.
I completely agree with the article here. Many security guards are generally displaced from their families, and already frustrated. Additionally, there is a tendency to lable the single woman as loose.
Curiously, a society that I previously lived in, refused to hire a better class of security guards because they would cost too much!!
Bhwandar,
Sorry to say, but you have completely missed the point here. How we treat women, or even how we (as you call the blessed ) treat people around has nothing to do with richness. It is all about your upbringing, exposure and your sanity.
Hope you get the point, and not digress. This post is about a completely different topic altogether.
What about the sense of entitlement that we the blessed (rich) have, flashing our 20K phone when most around us don’t earn that much in over two months. And then the ‘I am your master’ and therfore I will order you attitude that is there among so many of us blessed. Not to say that the guard is not guilty, but sometimes we also need to look within how we behave with all around us, the not so blessed, the not so learned, the one’s who aren’t there till something happens…