Now What?

Commuters return to work the day after three bomb blasts shook through Mumbai on Wednesday, July 13. Photo: Kainaz Amaria.
A terrorist attack has a way of reminding you of your powerlessness. It galvanises certain people and professions, like doctors, nurses, policemen and firemen. It brings politicians, leaders of tactical forces and the state administration into the spotlight since the responsibility of fact-finding and blame-placing falls upon them. If you’re a journalist covering the culture and/or lifestyle beat, a terrorist attack renders you useless. The definition of “hot spot” changes drastically when there’s been a bomb blast–or three, as was the case last week–and your areas of expertise are considered frivolous. When a city has been attacked, it is assumed that the citizens have graver concerns than art exhibitions, revamped restaurant menus, music concerts, new films, book launches and the like. It is expected that coming face to face with terror will unsettle us and for a few days at the very least, the only thoughts we will entertain would be sombre, anti-terrorism ones. That’s the basic expectation with which every terrorist plot is conceived.
Today, a person’s safety is as precarious in India’s financial capital as it is in Karachi or Kabul. It isn’t as though everyday life comes to a standstill in those cities when a bomb rips through security cordons and marketplaces, and neither does it in Mumbai. Earlier, this ability to bounce back and follow a normal, unterrified routine was praised by one and all. This time, it’s the very thing that has unsettled many. When Mumbai Boss put up a post about a beer and burger fest on the day after, one Sarah Eapen left this comment on the Facebook page: “Absolutely insensitive update for a day like this, after what happened yesterday.” Which begs the question, what should be our response to a terrorist attack?
In 2008, in the issue that came out right after 26/11, Time Out Mumbai published a photograph taken by food writer and Colaba resident Antoine Lewis during that terrible weekend. It showed boys playing cricket on the rooftops of Colaba, unperturbed by the fact that Chabad House was less than a boundary away. It was meant to be an image of Mumbai’s defiance, not of foolhardiness or callousness shown by kids who couldn’t care less that commandos were being dropped on nearby roofs or that innocent people were being killed a few buildings away. A little less than three years later, Naresh Fernandes, who then edited Time Out Mumbai and is now the consulting editor, lamented the city’s soullessness in this blog post for The New Yorker. As an example, he wrote about how a few people were disgruntled when the 10pm show of Delhi Belly was cancelled on the day that bomb blasts killed 19 at Opera House, Dadar and Zaveri Bazar. Clearly for him, Mumbai’s stubborn determination to be untouched by the violence it suffers is no longer a sign of strength.
What the repeated attacks on Mumbai have achieved is a widespread sense of numbness. The only thing that pierces through this dark ennui is the pleasure offered by frivolous things like culture and recreational activities. In simple language, this means enjoying life as though nothing had ever disrupted the normal flow of things. Of course, this could be a callow but effective means of distracting attention from the brutality around you. But when the day after a bomb blast, we ask you to go out and have a beer, see an art show, attend a concert or watch a movie, we’re striving to create a sense of normalcy; one that doesn’t belittle the losses of the day before but rather makes a statement.
The point of a plot like what Mumbai witnessed last week is to make a statement that the security of a Goliath-like state can be compromised by David-esque terrorists. In the transcripts of the phone conversations that the terrorists had with their handlers during 26/11 in 2008, the handlers repeatedly said that this operation must strike fear into the hearts of all those who were in the hotel and those who were watching the siege on television. Every explosion underscores the fragility of what is considered a normal existence and is designed to push us closer to panic. Consequently, when you go to work the morning after a set of coordinated bomb blasts or arrange to meet friends for beer and burger at Woodside Inn, you are effectively doing what the Indian government’s intelligence department failed to do: foil the terrorists’ plan.
Tags: Bomb Blasts, Deepanjana Pal, The Definite ArticleComments (4)
Leave a comment
Featured Articles
First Look At New Secret South Mumbai Bar The Local
June 18, 2013 by Purva Mehra
News Corp
June 17, 2013 by Pronoti Datta
Editor’s Notes: GQ’s Che Kurrien
June 17, 2013 by Editors
20 Food Websites To Bookmark
June 14, 2013 by EditorsYou Might Also Like...


Shortly after the blasts, @dpanjana tweeted a joke about the Rihanna song Umbrella since one of the bombs had been placed under one. Such a sarcastic attempt at humor or whatever you want to call it is not a brave attempt to get back to life or to defeat the terrorists. It is not that she was numb, but just that she is dumb.
“Having a muted day after doesn’t mean the terrorists have succeeded but that you empathize and show respect to the lives that have been taken.”
Surely that’s a matter of interpretation?
What does it mean to show respect to these lives? An average of 4 people die every day crossing the train tracks on Mumbai’s busy suburban railway network.
There are terror attacks averaging twice a week in our beloved state of Kashmir. But consider this, in a country that has a population of more than a billion, a city that has more than 20 million people, there are bound to be deaths, many deaths everyday.
What does it mean to show respect? To say “yes, we will not go about our lives in the usual manner (which may or may not include going to the beer n burger festival) but we shall bitch about the government and the state of the nation and the plight of the people instead”
Or is it to protest against the government (NOT candle marches), by taking to the streets and demanding that “action” be taken “now”?
I’m only looking for clarification. And what does it matter if someone else is indifferent to the loss of some lives? At the end of the day, there is no “spirit” of a city. There are just multitudes of people, trying to get by.
What if there was this person who had suffered a series of tragedies and failures in their personal life – loss of a limb or a loved one – and had just found something to redeem their happiness in life on that day – which just happened to be after the blasts – and wanted to celebrate? Rather indifferent of you, don’t you think?
Couldn’t agree more with Aania..
Partying a few hrs after such a tragedy or this weird suggestion that getting back to routine spoils the terrorists’ plan is insane!
It’s not the spirit of Mumbai, it’s the indifference of Mumbaikars!
Instead of media professionals searching ways to transform public anger into positive action, by building popular opinion on how government’s callous ways about security of it’s citizens are turning innocents into lambs to the slaughter;
We have to endure such rubbish which actually encourages the “care-a-f**k as long is i’m not affected” majority!
There is a thin line between striving to create a sense of normalcy and indifference. Having a muted day after doesn’t mean the terrorists have succeeded but that you empathize and show respect to the lives that have been taken. Going about as if nothing happened smacks of indifference.